CONTROLLED FREQUENCY BREATHING HAS NO TRAINING BENEFIT
Town, G. P., & Vanness, M. J. (1990). Conditioning swimmers: aerobic and anaerobic responses to controlled frequency breathing under watchful eye. Swimming Technique, May-July, 8-12.
Fourteen Wheaton College swimmers in peak condition performed tethered swimming under increasing resistance loads. Different rates of controlled frequency breathing (CFB) were used.
CFB is a form of hypoxic training (breathing occurs less often than normal). Coaches maintain that this form of training improves both aerobic and anaerobic adaptation as well as developing a tolerance for higher levels of blood lactate.
This study failed to show a relationship between CFB and elevated blood lactate levels. Under the condition of breathing once every eight strokes VO2 was not maintained. There was a proportional decrease in ventilation associated with increased breathing restriction, but tidal volume increased as a compensatory response. As CFB increased, stroke mechanics worsened (the rate increased as CFB increased).
Implication. There appears to be no positive training effect or value to using CFB as a training activity. It may be counter-productive. Since the swimmer needs to compensate for the loss of breath by increasing the amount of strokes used, concentration on technique deteriorates. Worsening a technique has no value.
Return to Table of Contents for Physiology of Swimming.