TEST SCORES IMPROVED WHEN TESTED IN THE PRESENCE OF COHORTS

Ignjatovic, A. M., Markovic, A., Ratko, S., & Mitic, P. (2013). Influence of competitive motivation on performance tests results. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 45(5), Supplement abstract number 1240.

red line

This study determined whether the results of physical performance tests are better when performed individually than when performed in pairs in the same testing environment. The difference in performance between 5 different physical fitness tests in males (N = 24) and females (N = 62) were investigated. Ss performed five different performance tests: 30-m run test, 10x 5m Agility Test, The Plate Tapping Test, Sit-Ups in 30 seconds, and Handgrip Test. Ss first performed the tests individually and then based on the results the pairs were matched for each test. Two testing sessions were performed in the same controlled environments one week apart. Tests were performed in public (watched by other Ss) that increased introjected action influenced by some form of self-imposed sanctions (e.g. shame, ego, enhancement, pride). During the bout testing sessions, Ss had the same form of extrinsic motivation such as reward by mark.

There were statistically significant differences between the two testing conditions for all the tests. The largest differences were in the tests that evaluated muscle strength and muscle strength endurance. Improvements in other tests were up to 6%. Both genders had similar increases in second testing conditions, except in the handgrip test, where females had a statistically higher increase 36%, than males 19%.

Implication. Participation in test settings with pairs matched according to their physical capabilities leads to better performance results during the test. Also, a higher competitive motivation was observed in both males and females.

Return to Table of Contents for this issue.

red line