PUBERTY SIGNALS THE ONSET OF ACCELERATED GENDER DIFFERENCES IN YOUNG SWIMMERS
Stager, J. M., & Cornett, A. (2012). Sex differences in childhood athletic performance. Presentation 1981 at the 59th Annual Meeting of the American College of Sports Medicine, San Francisco, California; May 29-June 2, 2012.
This study tested for the presence of an age by gender interaction for a complex motor performance task and to determine whether or not gender differences exist for the performance of this task during childhood. Data for this project were provided by USA Swimming and consisted of the best 50-yard freestyle performance for all USAS registered male and female swimmers from 6-19 years of age that competed in the event from 2005-2010 (N = 1,193,362). The distribution location was determined for each combination of age, gender, and competition year.
There was a significant age by gender interaction effect. Simple effects analysis indicated that the location parameter was significantly lower (i.e., times were faster) for boys than girls for 8-10 and 13-19 year olds while there was no difference in the location parameter between boys and girls 6-7 and 11-12 years old. The mean difference in the location parameter between boys and girls was significantly greater for 13-19 year olds than for 6-12 year olds.
Implication. The age by gender interaction for 50-yard Freestyle performance parallels the reported maturational changes. The marked acceleration in height, weight, and strength in boys beginning around 13 years magnifies the relatively small preadolescent gender differences. These traits play a crucial role in the increased performance difference between boys and girls from 12 to 13 years. While maturational traits play a role in adolescent performance differences, their role in childhood performance differences is unclear. Additional research is needed to determine whether or not the superior performance of boys relative to girls relates to physiological parameters and/or gender differences in participation and selection bias.
Return to Table of Contents for this issue.